Someone told me that most applications in quad-core processors don’t use all the processors in it, so there is little difference between them. Is this true? Is a quad-core processors REALLY that much better than dual-cores? Is it worth the extra money? I do semi-professional audio recording using a basic Pro Tools set up, and for my new computer (which I will build), I need to know if this is worth getting the quad-core instead of the dual-core.
Thanks!
Incoming PC Tutorial search:
- difference between dual core and quad core
- difference between dual and quad core
- difference between dual core and quad core processors
- whats the differnce between dual core and quad core
- multi core processor tutorial
- what is the difference between quad core and dual core for games
- difference between quad core and dual core
- what\s the difference in a core and a dual core processor
- do i need a quad core processor 2011
- what is difference between dual core processor and quad core processor in computer
Related PC Tutorial:
- What's the difference between quad core processors and IntelCore i3, i5 & i7's ?
- What is the difference between Dual core and Core 2 Dual processors?
- How can I find out if my motherboard can support dual core?
- Whats the difference between different processors?
- Multi Core Processors For Real Time Multi Tasking
the difference is 2
The more cores you have the more things you can do like run programs and apps at the same time with out cpu bloat!
If your not multi-tasking then you don’t need quad core!
Quad cores are for hardcore gamers who want a little better specs. They don’t work with older programs but new games that are coming out, they support it. When you move to quad core it’s not really worth the extra money because you will get more out of a dual core much more before you will from a quad core.
I don’t recommend a quad-core for your purposes.
In simple terms it is like comparing one big single engine to many small engines. the small engines are almost equal to or greater in power than the one big one. but the advantage of quad is you can run a lolt of programs
well….its better for sure but for what you do….I guess you wont stay with lots of other programs opened so the most impportant thing is
to have memory and sound card for your case….
something like 4 gb of memory and a good good sound card….
the processor thing is when you are going to make the computer suffer hhahaha….like for companies this kind of stuff …..
The comparison of quad core to dual core generally depends on the software that you use most. Find out if your software supports quad core capabilities. Most of today’s software still doesn’t use all four cores, so a dual core is generally better.
Dual (meaning two) core has two processing chips in the cpu. Quad (four) core has four of them. Once again, some software use all four, some only use two, some (older ones) even use one. Each one of these chips has its own processing speed. The higher the processing speed per chip, the better the cpu. So if you compare a dual-core processor with, say, 2.5 GHz per chip to a quad-core processor with 2.3 GHz per chip, the quad-core would be more useful for a program that uses all four cores (because 2.3 * 4 = 9.3) but not as useful for a program that only uses two cores (because 2.3 * 2 = 4.6). It would be better to use a dual core with a higher processing speed for a program that only uses two cores.